Saturday, October 3, 2026

NASA’s Webb Provides Crash Course on Planet-Shattering Collisions

In the early history of our solar system, scientists theorize that a Mars-sized object called Theia smashed into the infant Earth, vaporizing massive amounts of rock and blasting it into space. Some of that material coalesced into the Moon, where NASA’s Artemis program is returning humans, preparing for Mars, and shaping the future of space exploration.

That long-ago, violent collision reshaped our home planet. Astronomers have used NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope to examine a class of young stellar systems that show signs of similar upheavals, providing clues to the amount of energy in their collisions. The results offer insights into the composition and evolution of these chaotic systems.

The team’s findings published Thursday in The Astrophysical Journal.

Image: Extreme Debris Disk (Artist’s Concept)

The types of collisions within young stellar systems known as extreme debris disks are relevant to scientists’ understanding of our own solar system, which is thought to have undergone similar impact events that created our Moon and shaped Earth’s initial state.

Artwork: NASA, ESA, CSA, Joseph Olmsted (STScI)

The environment surrounding a star changes as it ages, beginning with a juvenile, gas-rich protoplanetary disk where forming planets can reside, before evolving to a gas-poor debris disk. During its mission lifetime, NASA’s retired Spitzer Space Telescope examined the debris disk stage and discovered a subclass termed extreme debris disks. These systems harbor unusually large amounts of warm dust close to the star, in the region comparable to where rocky planets orbit in our solar system. A team of astronomers led by Kate Su of the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado investigated these intriguing objects with Webb.

Contrary to theoretical predictions, which suggest we should observe many extreme debris disks, observations indicate that these environments are rare. Scientists estimate roughly only 1% of young stars show observable signatures of this phase based on the data collected so far, including possibly our own solar system during its formation. Despite their rarity, the team was able to compile a sample of 21 extreme debris disks, including five from Spitzer’s archival data and 16 from Webb, with 12 newly observed disks and follow-up observations on four of Spitzer’s.

“This is the first time we have gathered enough systems to truly understand this subclass that we call extreme debris disks,” said Su, lead author of the paper. “Before Webb, we had limited information. We knew that they are weird and very different from the typical cold debris disks that we know, like Vega and Fomalhaut. Now that we have more data, we can pin down what these disks represent for planet formation and evolution.”

The team confirmed that extreme debris disks share three key properties: smaller dust grains than those in protoplanetary or classic debris disks, a high concentration of warm dust, and irregular brightness variations, all revealed by mid-infrared spectra from Webb and Spitzer.

To determine the driving factor for these qualities, the team studied the mineralogical makeup of the disks. They found that their sample could be categorized into silica-rich and silica-poor disks. Volcanic glass like obsidian is one example of silica-rich material found on Earth, whereas the silica-poor mineral forsterite appears as green sand grains on some beaches in Hawaii. An extreme debris disk’s category relays information on the type of collisions producing the impact debris and may help account for its variability in infrared brightness.

“To just see their mid-infrared emission and beautiful spectral features with Webb, which allowed us to identify their compositions, was the most exciting thing for me,” said Agnes Kospal of Konkoly Observatory in Budapest, Hungary, and a coauthor of the study. “We have no other way to study these planetary embryos directly because they are too small.”

Of their sample, about one-third is silica-rich, suggesting these disks are produced by high-energy impacts between Mars-sized bodies where a significant portion of the material is vaporized. The remaining two-thirds of their sample is silica-poor, indicating that the collisions are occurring on smaller scales, like grazing, between Moon-sized objects. Silica-rich disks are found only around stars younger than 300 million years, while silica-poor disks persist across a broad range of ages and often show greater brightness variability. The team proposes that this variability is driven by the rapid evolution of fresh debris through orbital changes and additional impacts.

Their findings can be applied to our own solar system, which may have experienced more than one extreme debris disk phase.

“How rocky planets formed and giant planets evolved are part of the broader story of the solar system’s formation. It’s all one story,” said Su. “Our work on extreme debris disks helps us bring together the big picture of what we currently understand.”

Image: Composition of Extreme Debris Disks Across Time

By investigating the compositions of extreme debris disks, scientists inferred that silica-rich disks are produced by high-energy impacts of Mars-sized objects, while silica-poor disks are created by less energetic events from Moon-sized bodies.

Illustration: NASA, ESA, CSA, Joseph Olmsted (STScI)

Simulations suggest that terrestrial planets, such as Earth, should form within the first few hundred million years of a solar system’s formation. This period fits with the ages of silica-rich extreme debris disks observed so far and aligns with the estimation that Earth and the Moon formed around 100 million years after the Sun formed, with the Moon likely being the result of a collision between Earth and a Mars-sized object.

As for whether our Sun underwent a silica-poor extreme disk phase, if older silica-poor disks and their random intervals of infrared brightness do reflect orbital instability, this would be broadly consistent with the Late Heavy Bombardment hypothesis for our solar system. In that scenario, the gas giant planets migrated significant distances, gravitationally disrupting the orbits of smaller bodies and triggering catastrophic collisions that generated the short-lived, dust-rich phases observed in extreme debris disks.

“Of course, there’s many things we still don’t know about these disks,” said Attila Moor of Konkoly Observatory, a coauthor of the study. “We expect no silica-rich systems among older extreme debris disks. We only have three disks in our sample that fit that age criteria, so it’ll be nice to observe more of these systems to confirm our hypothesis.”

The James Webb Space Telescope is the world’s premier space science observatory. Webb is solving mysteries in our solar system, looking beyond to distant worlds around other stars, and probing the mysterious structures and origins of our universe and our place in it. Webb is an international program led by NASA with its partners, ESA (European Space Agency) and CSA (Canadian Space Agency).


To learn more about Webb, visit: https://science.nasa.gov/webb 

Source: NASA’s Webb Provides Crash Course on Planet-Shattering Collisions - NASA Science

Glucosamine and Alzheimer’s: Why Scientists Are Asking Questions About a Popular Joint Supplement

Glucosamine is one of the most popular over-the-counter supplements for achy joints, especially among older adults. A new study from the University of Florida now suggests it deserves a closer look in people who already have memory and thinking problems. The researchers stress that the results are preliminary and do not show that the supplement causes harm.

What the researchers found in patient records

The team, led by senior author Ramon Sun, used artificial intelligence to analyze deidentified UF Health records from 2012 to 2024. They focused on patients diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease or a related dementia (ADRD) and on patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a stage where memory or thinking problems are greater than expected for a person’s age but don’t necessarily disrupt daily life.

In both groups, about 8% of patients reported taking glucosamine. That amounted to 1,896 people with ADRD and 2,750 people with MCI. After adjusting for age, sex and demographics, two patterns stood out:

·         Among people with MCI, glucosamine use was associated with a 25% higher likelihood of progressing to dementia.

·         Among people who already had ADRD, glucosamine use was associated with a 25% higher risk of death over a defined period. This was not seen in the MCI group, which hints that any effect may be stronger once dementia is established.

This kind of analysis can only show associations. People who take a supplement may differ from those who don’t in ways the study couldn’t fully account for, so the records alone cannot show that glucosamine speeds up disease.

A possible mechanism: too many sugar tags

The researchers also looked for a biological explanation. Cells routinely attach sugar structures to proteins, a process that helps proteins fold correctly, reach the right location and do their jobs. The team found signs that this sugar-tagging system is overactive in Alzheimer’s disease. The study’s title calls the problem hyperglycosylation and describes it as a metabolic driver of the disease.

Glucosamine is a sugar-related molecule that can cross the blood-brain barrier and feed into the pathways that build these sugar structures. Supplements can be made from shellfish shells or corn. The researchers suggest that the same molecule may act differently in a healthy brain than in one affected by Alzheimer’s, and that the Alzheimer’s brain may be especially vulnerable to this pathway.

Evidence from mice and human brain tissue

To test the idea, the team turned to genetically modified mice that model Alzheimer’s disease. Glucosamine markedly increased the attachment of sugars to proteins inside cells, and the treated mice performed worse on a test of social memory, the ability to recognize other animals. When the researchers used a chemical treatment to suppress the sugar attachment, memory performance improved. That suggests excessive sugar tagging may play a direct role in the memory problems rather than just appearing alongside them.

Human brain tissue told a similar story. Samples from people with Alzheimer’s disease, provided by the UF Neuromedicine Brain and Tissue Bank, showed significantly more sugar attachment than tissue from people without the disease. A spatial technology developed in Sun’s lab, which can map thousands of molecules in tissue, helped reveal these metabolic changes.

Beyond plaques and tangles

Much Alzheimer’s research has focused on amyloid plaques between brain cells and tau tangles inside neurons. This work adds to a growing body of evidence that disrupted metabolism may also drive the disease. Sun suggests that correcting the metabolic defect could complement treatments aimed at plaques and tangles, and that the overactive sugar-tagging pathway could become a drug target in its own right.

What this does and doesn’t mean

The study raises an important clinical question, but it does not establish that people should stop taking glucosamine. A controlled human clinical trial will be needed to determine whether the supplement directly accelerates Alzheimer’s progression and, if so, which patients are most at risk. In the meantime, anyone with memory concerns who takes glucosamine may want to talk with their doctor about it rather than making changes on their own.

Sources

Press release: UF Health, via ScienceDaily

Original paper: Hawkinson TR, et al. Hyperglycosylation is a metabolic driver of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature Metabolism, 2026; 8(6): 1410. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-026-01538-4 

Source: Glucosamine and Alzheimer’s: Why Scientists Are Asking Questions About a Popular Joint Supplement