Thursday, October 29, 2026

NASA’s Swift Mission Ends, Leaves Behind Scientific Bonanza

NASA’s Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory has ended its science mission now that the spacecraft is orbiting less than 171 miles (275 kilometers) above Earth’s surface. The greater atmospheric drag at this height prevents the satellite’s telescopes from steadily gazing at their astronomical targets.

Swift conducted its final observation on Oct. 20. It is expected to re-enter the atmosphere in the next few weeks.

NASA’s Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory orbits above Earth in this artist’s concept.

NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Conceptual Image Lab

“Swift delivered an incredible, lasting return on investment for the nation, designed for a two-year primary mission but productive for more than 10 times as long,” said Shawn Domagal-Goldman, director, Astrophysics Division at NASA Headquarters in Washington. “In that time, Swift played a major role in advancing our understanding of the changing universe and was part of a revolution in astrophysics that showed how critical rapid-response observations are to the entire community. To support rapid response to cosmic events in a post-Swift world, we’re exploring our ability to use and augment NASA’s fleet of existing space telescopes, from fast-to-orbit commercial capabilities to efficient, innovative new missions. And Swift leaves us with an extraordinary archive of multiwavelength observations that will fuel new discoveries for decades more.”

In its storied career, Swift has observed more than 2,000 gamma-ray bursts, the most powerful explosions in the cosmos. It has studied more than 1,400 supernova explosions, witnessed stars shredded by black holes, monitored active galaxies, conducted an all-sky X-ray survey, studied asteroids and comets, and more. Swift data has contributed to about 7,000 published scientific papers.

“Swift was designed as a satellite dedicated to studying gamma-ray bursts, outbursts that came and went so quickly that no one could target them with large telescopes to learn more,” said S. Bradley Cenko, the mission’s principal investigator at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. “Swift needed to detect and locate gamma-ray bursts, communicate their position to other observatories, and then swing its telescopes around to image the burst locations before their afterglows faded out. This typically took Swift about a minute to do.”

Led by its first principal investigator, Neil Gehrels, Swift was born as a multiwavelength observatory, with co-aligned Optical/Ultraviolet and X-ray telescopes that could quickly image and refine a burst’s position. The mission launched into orbit on Nov. 20, 2004, and went to work the following month. In 2018, NASA renamed the mission to honor Gehrels following his death.

The completed Swift spacecraft is seen in a clean room at NASA Goddard on Sept. 9, 2003. In front of it, Neil Gehrels, the mission’s first principal investigator, points toward the instruments at the top.

NASA

Speed was especially important for an elusive population called short gamma-ray bursts, which reach peak brightness in less than two seconds. Until Swift, it had been impossible to locate these bursts rapidly and precisely enough to observe their afterglows. In May 2005, Swift achieved this milestone with GRB 050509B, which lasted just 0.03 seconds. Swift turned to the burst fast enough to detect 11 X-ray photons, making this the first short burst with a detected afterglow. These observations validated long-standing theoretical models, showing that short gamma-ray bursts likely come from mergers of two neutron stars — objects with the mass of the Sun that have been crushed to the size of a city.

Another factor led to Swift’s success as a kind of astronomical multitool. Its flexible planning system enabled astronomers to request "target-of-opportunity" observations that could be commanded from the ground in as little as a few minutes, or to set up monitoring programs for observing specific sources lasting from as little as a few minutes to months. The system could schedule up to 75 independent targets a day.

"The unique speed of response of the Swift hardware, the extraordinary success of the rapid mission operations, and the closely knit teamwork of the Swift Flight and Science Operations teams placed Swift at the crossroads of burgeoning areas of research," said John Nousek, the mission’s operations director and professor of astronomy and astrophysics in the Eberly College of Science at Penn State in University Park, Pennsylvania.

The Swift archive contains nearly 22 years of brightness measurements of all kinds of cosmic outbursts, multiwavelength spectra, more than 1.5 million images from its Ultraviolet/Optical Telescope, and much more. The full dataset, publicly available as part of NASA’s commitment to open, gold standard science, spans approximately 12 terabytes, the storage equivalent of about 600 high-definition movies.  

As part of the agency’s previous planning for Swift’s end of mission, NASA will continue to prioritize finding new options to react rapidly to cosmic events, using current missions to help fill the gap in the meantime.

To learn more about the Swift mission, visit: https://nasa.gov/swift 

Francis Reddy

Source: NASA’s Swift Mission Ends, Leaves Behind Scientific Bonanza - NASA Science

Climate health harms outpace action, prompting calls for global health emergency - Earth - Environment

Credit: CC0 Public Domain

The 2026 Report of The Lancet Countdown on Health and Climate Change finds that many of the health risks and harms of climate change grew faster in the decade since the Paris Agreement was introduced (2016–2025) than in the decade before it (2006–2015).

Clean energy investment, health system leadership, more health-protecting legislation and growing scientific evidence helped deliver real health gains, but not enough to offset the rapidly growing harm from fossil fuel–driven climate change.

The report's authors call for climate change to be formally recognized and addressed as a global health emergency, and for health to shape both climate policies and funding priorities to prevent climate change.

The 10th Lancet Countdown annual report, led by University College London (UCL) and produced in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) and published in The Lancet, represents the work of 146 multidisciplinary researchers from more than 100 institutions across more than 30 countries.

Published ahead of the 31st U.N. Conference of the Parties (COP31), it tracks 54 indicators of the health impacts of climate change and the health effects of climate action, including four new indicators introduced this year covering the availability of water in land (indicator 1.2.2), health care sector greenhouse gas footprint assessments (indicator 3.5.2), climate-related health research funding (indicator 4.3.4) and legislative engagement with health and climate change (indicator 5.5).

New this year, the report includes an updated media engagement indicator (indicator 5.1) and now also attributes estimated heat-related deaths to human-caused climate change (indicator 1.1.5).

"A decade after the Paris Agreement, our findings are unambiguous: the health harms of climate change are growing faster than the world's response to them, and in many cases even accelerating," says professor Marina Romanello, executive director of The Lancet Countdown, based at University College London.

"Real progress has been made in clean energy, health system readiness and health-protective regulation, all of which are already delivering health benefits to local communities. However, progress has been too slow, too small, and isn't reaching those who need it most. That is why we are calling for climate change to be formally recognized as a global health emergency, with health placed at the center of every climate decision."

Many health harms accelerating faster than a decade ago

Heat was linked to an average of 540,800 estimated deaths per year between 2016 and 2023, 68% of them (369,900) caused by climate change, up from 55% (219,100) per year in 2006–2015. In 2023 alone, the hottest year in that period, heat was linked to a record 710,000 estimated deaths, exceeding those from malaria or HIV, with 71.5% of them driven by climate change. Altogether, climate change is estimated to have caused almost 3 million heat deaths between 2016 and 2023.

Heat also reduced people's capacity to work productively in 2025, costing the global economy an estimated $1.07 trillion in potential income (0.91% of global economic output), the third consecutive year that losses topped $1 trillion. Southeast Asia and Africa were hit hardest, with losses equivalent to 3.9% and 3.2% of GDP, respectively, compared with 0.2% in Europe and 1.5% in the Americas.

The agriculture and construction sectors, both largely outdoor and physically demanding, absorbed the biggest share of the losses (38% and 29%, respectively), because heat directly affects people's labor productivity and puts workers' health at risk. The impact is particularly pronounced in Africa, where agriculture accounts for 71% of heat-related potential income losses.

More than half the world's land (51.8%) was hit by extreme drought for at least a month in 2025, the second-worst year on record after 2023. Since 2016, the area affected by drought has grown more than 700% faster than it did in 2006–2015.

In addition, a new satellite analysis identifies growing extremes in water storage. Since 2003, 43% of the world's land has seen a long-term drop in water storage (getting drier) while a separate 37% has seen a long-term rise (getting wetter), together creating hydrological extremes affecting more than 80% of the world's land and threatening crops, food supplies and sanitation.

Very extreme rainfall is also becoming more common, reaching almost 17.2% of global land each year in 2016–2025, up from 14.8% the previous decade, and increasing the risk of floods, landslides and waterborne disease.

"These numbers point to a clear emergency," says Romanello. "The rate of increase in many climate-related health threats is accelerating, while heat deaths linked to climate change have reached a record high, and the economic toll is battering vulnerable sectors and communities the hardest.

"The risks become even more profound when you consider how different hazards interact and compound. At the same time, drought is spreading, and the world is swinging to water extremes, some drying out, while others are flooding. This isn't a gradual worsening; it's a step change that must be recognized as the global health emergency it is."

Despite gains, progress is falling short

Cleaner energy, more resilient health systems, more health-protecting legislation and growing scientific evidence have brought real health benefits to local communities since the 2016 Paris Agreement, but these gains are still too slow, insufficient and inconsistent to offset the growing risks.

Global investment in clean energy grew 7.2% in 2025, to a record $2.1 trillion, 82% more than the $1.16 trillion invested in fossil fuels. Such investment has helped renewable electricity grow from 5.5% of total generation in 2016 to 13.5% in 2023. Health gains are already evident, with cleaner air preventing an estimated 323,000 deaths a year in at least 77 countries where air pollution from fossil fuels has fallen since 2016.

However, rising overall energy demand and slow system change mean fossil fuels still supply over 80% of the world's energy, and climate-heating emissions reached a record high in 2024. Despite gains in some countries, fossil fuel air pollution still kills an estimated 2.73 million people a year worldwide.

Health systems are taking important early action: a quarter (56 of 194) of WHO member states now have a national plan for adapting health services to climate change, up from just 14 in 2015, and 47 have separately completed a vulnerability assessment to underpin plans.

Beyond planning, almost half of WHO member states reported already having a health surveillance system that incorporates climate information, and more than half (75 of 145 respondents) reported having at least one climate-informed health early warning system. The report finds that health early warning systems are slowing down the increase in deaths from extreme weather events in those places that have them.

Legal momentum is building as well. National laws referencing both climate change and health have risen roughly 50-fold since 2000, most of that since 2016. Funding for climate-related health research has also increased, up 655% between 2016 and 2024 from $42 million to $316 million, though almost all of it (84%) still goes to researchers in the world's wealthiest countries, leaving evidence gaps where the risks are often greatest.

"Ten years ago, we proposed that responding to climate change could offer the greatest health opportunity of the 21st century through adaptation efforts and rapid progress in phasing down fossil fuels and other emission sources," says professor Anthony Costello, co-chair of The Lancet Countdown.

"A decade on, we have proof that health-centered climate action works: cleaner air, more resilient health care and warning systems are protecting health and saving lives globally. But the pace and scale of emissions reduction remain entirely out of step with the pace and scale of the harm."

Fossil fuel expansion and funding gaps raise the risk

The report finds that progress on the transition away from fossil fuels is continuing to fall short. Fossil fuel production plans are increasingly misaligned with the Paris Agreement's 1.5°C goal, with the world's 100 largest oil and gas companies now planning to produce 150% more fossil fuels by 2040 than is compatible with keeping warming to 1.5°C, up from 138% in 2025.

Production plans persist despite rising fossil fuel costs, which are straining public finances. In response to energy price spikes, global net fossil fuel subsidies reached record levels in 2022–2024, and 10 countries spent more on them in 2024 than on their health systems. Net subsidies have doubled since 2016, with countries allocating a cumulative $6.20 trillion to them since the Paris Agreement was introduced.

Despite the critical need to move away from fossil fuels to protect health and lives, vested interests continue to obstruct progress. The report details how lobbying and disinformation by fossil fuel interests and their political allies continue to weaken support for climate action, despite growing scientific evidence linking climate change and health. The report also finds that national governments, international organizations and the private sector are now less engaged with health and climate change, reversing previous progress.

Adaptation funding is falling far short of what's needed: the health adaptation needs quantified so far by developing countries (as classified by UNFCCC) put the minimum cost at $3.3 billion a year, based on data from only 48 of the 79 countries that have completed these estimates. Yet only around a third of this declared need, $1.1 billion, was committed in 2024.

This substantial financing gap is reflected in countries' ability to translate adaptation priorities into action, with financing and staffing identified as the top barriers to implementation of Health National Adaptation Plans. Shrinking foreign aid budgets, including cuts to official development assistance, risk widening this gap and placing the heaviest burden on the most vulnerable countries.

A call to declare a global health emergency

A decade after the Paris Agreement, the report's authors are calling for climate change to be formally declared a global health emergency, for a new WHO instrument to enable a coordinated global response, and for governments to put health at the center of every climate decision, from emissions targets to climate funding. Priorities include urgent, fair cuts to greenhouse gas emissions, sustained investment in science, and climate finance for health delivered as grants rather than loans, so that countries can adapt without taking on more debt.

"This report is a stark warning that climate change is a health emergency. What's missing is not evidence, but the political will to act on it," said Helen Clark, former prime minister of New Zealand and chair of the board of The Lancet Countdown.

"Governments must double down on their climate action commitments and rebuild momentum for international cooperation. This must go hand in hand with rapid emissions reductions and significantly greater support for adaptation, particularly for the communities least responsible for climate change and most vulnerable to its impacts."

Provided by Lancet  

Source: Climate health harms outpace action, prompting calls for global health emergency