Saturday, January 31, 2026
Male bonobos track females' reproductive cycle to maximize mating success - Biology - Plants & Animals - Ecology
Male–male
agonistic interaction during a mating attempt in wild bonobos. Credit: Heungjin
Ryu (CC-BY 4.0, creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Male bonobos can
decipher females' unreliable fertility signals, allowing them to focus their
efforts on matings with the highest chance of conception, according to a study
by Heungjin Ryu at Kyoto University, Japan, and colleagues published in PLOS Biology.
In most mammals, females are only
receptive to mating during ovulation, allowing males to time their mating
efforts to maximize the chances of conception. But in some primates, such as
bonobos (Pan paniscus), females become sexually receptive and display a
conspicuous pink swelling around the genitals for a prolonged period of time.
How researchers studied bonobo fertility
To investigate how males cope with
this unreliable fertility signal, researchers studied a group of wild bonobos
at Wamba in the Luo Scientific Reserve in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
During daily observations, they
recorded sexual behaviors and visually estimated the status of each female's
genital swelling. They also used filter paper to collect urine samples of the
females, allowing them to measure estrogen and progesterone levels and estimate
the timing of ovulation.
They found that ovulation probability peaked between eight and 27 days after females reached maximum swelling, making it difficult for males to predict. Despite this, males' sexual advances were closely aligned with the timing of ovulation. Males concentrated their mating efforts on females that had reached maximum swelling earlier, and whose infant offspring were older—two key sources of information indicating a higher probability of ovulation.
In this clip, the beta male Nobita carefully
looks at the sexual swelling of the female Sala while they forage for fungi on
the forest floor. Male bonobos take this task seriously—watching and checking
swelling changes so they do not miss potential ovulatory periods. Credit:
Heungjin Ryu (CC-BY 4.0, creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Implications for bonobo mating strategies
The results show that males focus
their mating efforts on the most fertile females by combining information about
the timing of swelling and reproductive history. Because male bonobos can
effectively estimate female fertility despite an unreliable signal, there has
likely been little evolutionary pressure for the signal to become more precise.
This may explain how this system has been maintained over evolutionary time,
the authors say.
The
authors add, "In this study, we found that bonobo males, instead of trying
to predict precise ovulation timing, use a flexible strategy—paying attention to the end-signal cue of the sexual
swelling along with infant age—to fine-tune their mating efforts. This finding
reveals that even imprecise signals can remain evolutionarily functional when
animals use them flexibly rather than expecting perfect accuracy.
"Our results help explain how
conspicuous but noisy ovulatory signals, like those of bonobos, can persist and
shape mating strategies in complex social environments.
"The male bonobos weren't the only
ones paying close attention to sexual swelling—we spent countless days in the
rainforest at Wamba, DRC doing exactly the same thing! All that watching,
sweating, and scribbling in our notebooks eventually paid off. By tracking
these daily changes, we uncovered just how impressively bonobos can read
meaning in a signal that seems noisy and confusing to us."
Provided by Public Library of Science
edited by Sadie Harley, reviewed by Robert Egan
Source: Male bonobos track females' reproductive cycle to maximize mating success
NASA’s Pandora Satellite, CubeSats to Explore Exoplanets, Beyond - UNIVERSE
Editor's Note, Jan. 11, 2026: NASA’s Pandora and the NASA-sponsored BlackCAT and SPARCS missions lifted off at 8:44 a.m. EST (5:44 a.m. PST) Sunday, Jan. 11.
A
new NASA spacecraft called Pandora is awaiting launch ahead of its journey to
study the atmospheres of exoplanets, or worlds beyond our solar system, and
their stars.
Along
for the ride are two shoebox-sized satellites called BlackCAT (Black Hole Coded
Aperture Telescope) and SPARCS (Star-Planet Activity Research CubeSat), as
NASA innovates with ambitious science missions that take low-cost, creative
approaches to answering questions like, “How does the universe work?” and “Are
we alone?”
All
three missions are set to launch Jan. 11 on a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Space
Launch Complex 4 East at Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. The
launch window opens at 8:19 a.m. EST (5:19 a.m. PST). SpaceX will livestream the
event.
Artist’s concept of NASA’s Pandora mission, which will
help scientists untangle the signals from the atmospheres of exoplanets —
worlds beyond our solar system — and their stars.
NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center/Conceptual Image
Lab
“Pandora’s goal is to disentangle the
atmospheric signals of planets and stars using visible and near-infrared
light,” said Elisa Quintana, Pandora’s principal investigator at NASA’s
Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt,
Maryland. “This information can help astronomers determine if detected elements
and compounds are coming from the star or the planet — an important step as we
search for signs of life in the cosmos.”
BlackCAT and SPARCS are small satellites
that will study the transient, high-energy universe and the activity of
low-mass stars, respectively.
Pandora will observe planets as they pass
in front of their stars as seen from our perspective, events called transits.
As starlight passes through a planet’s
atmosphere, it interacts with substances like water and oxygen that absorb
characteristic wavelengths, adding their chemical fingerprints to
the signal.
But while only a small fraction of the
star’s light grazes the planet, telescopes also collect the rest of the light
emitted by the star’s facing side. Stellar surfaces can sport brighter and darker regions that grow, shrink, and change position over time, suppressing or
magnifying signals from planetary atmospheres. Adding a further complication,
some of these areas may contain the same chemicals that astronomers hope to
find in the planet’s atmosphere, such as water vapor.
All these factors make it difficult to
be certain that important detected molecules come from the planet alone.
Pandora will help address this problem
by providing in-depth study of at least 20 exoplanets and their host stars during its initial year. The satellite will
look at each planet and its star 10 times, with each observation lasting a
total of 24 hours. Many of these worlds are among the over 6,000 discovered by
missions like NASA’s TESS (Transiting Exoplanet Survey
Satellite).
This view of the fully integrated Pandora spacecraft
was taken May 19, 2025, following the mission’s successful environmental test
campaign at Blue Canyon Technologies in Lafayette, Colorado. Visible are star
trackers (center), multilayer insulation blankets (white), the end of the
telescope (top), and the solar panel (right) in its launch configuration.
NASA/BCT
Pandora will collect visible and near-infrared light using a novel,
all-aluminum 17-inch-wide (45-centimeter) telescope jointly developed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California and Corning Incorporated in Keene,
New Hampshire. Pandora’s near-infrared detector is a spare developed for NASA’s
James Webb Space Telescope.
Each long observation period will
capture a star’s light both before and during a transit and help determine how
stellar surface features impact measurements.
“These intense studies of
individual systems are difficult to schedule on high-demand missions, like
Webb,” said engineer Jordan Karburn, Pandora’s deputy project manager at
Livermore. “You also need the simultaneous multiwavelength measurements to pick
out the star’s signal from the planet’s. The long stares with both detectors
are critical for tracing the exact origins of elements and compounds scientists
consider indicators of potential habitability.”
Pandora is the first satellite to
launch in the agency’s Astrophysics Pioneers program, which seeks to do compelling astrophysics at a lower
cost while training the next generation of leaders in space science.
After launching into low Earth
orbit, Pandora will undergo a month of commissioning before embarking on its
one-year prime mission. All the mission’s data will be publicly available.
“The Pandora mission is a bold new chapter in exoplanet exploration,” said Daniel Apai, an astronomy and planetary science professor at the University of Arizona in Tucson where the mission’s operations center resides. “It is the first space telescope built specifically to study, in detail, starlight filtered through exoplanet atmospheres. Pandora’s data will help scientists interpret observations from past and current missions like NASA’s Kepler and Webb space telescopes. And it will guide future projects in their search for habitable worlds.”
Watch to learn more about NASA’s Pandora mission, which will
revolutionize the study of exoplanet atmospheres.
NASA's
Goddard Space Flight Center
The BlackCAT and SPARCS missions will
take off alongside Pandora through NASA’s Astrophysics CubeSat program, the
latter supported by the Agency's CubeSat Launch Initiative.
CubeSats are a class of nanosatellites
that come in sizes that are multiples of a standard cube measuring 3.9 inches
(10 centimeters) across. Both BlackCAT and SPARCS are 11.8 by 7.8 by 3.9 inches
(30 by 20 by 10 centimeters). CubeSats are designed to provide cost-effective
access to space to test new technologies and educate early career scientists
and engineers while delivering compelling science.
The BlackCAT mission will use a
wide-field telescope and a novel type of X-ray detector to study powerful
cosmic explosions like gamma-ray bursts, particularly those from the early universe, and other fleeting cosmic
events. It will join NASA’s network of missions that watch for these changes.
Abe Falcone at Pennsylvania State University in
University Park, where the satellite was designed and built, leads the mission
with contributions from Los Alamos National Laboratory in
New Mexico. Kongsberg NanoAvionics US provided the spacecraft bus.
The SPARCS CubeSat will monitor flares
and other activity from low-mass stars using ultraviolet light to determine how
they affect the space environment around orbiting planets. Evgenya Shkolnik at Arizona State University in Tempe leads the mission with participation from NASA’s
Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern
California. In addition to providing science support, JPL developed the
ultraviolet detectors and the associated electronics. Blue Canyon Technologies
fabricated the spacecraft bus.
Pandora is led by NASA Goddard.
Livermore provides the mission’s project management and engineering. Pandora’s
telescope was manufactured by Corning and developed collaboratively with
Livermore, which also developed the imaging detector assemblies, the mission’s
control electronics, and all supporting thermal and mechanical subsystems. The
near-infrared sensor was provided by NASA Goddard. Blue Canyon Technologies
provided the bus and performed spacecraft assembly, integration, and
environmental testing. NASA’s Ames Research Center in
California’s Silicon Valley will perform the mission’s data processing.
Pandora’s mission operations center is located at the University of Arizona,
and a host of additional universities support the science team.
By Jeanette Kazmierczak
NASA’s
Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
Source: NASA’s Pandora Satellite, CubeSats to Explore Exoplanets, Beyond - NASA Science
Extreme January Cold - NASA Earth Observatory - EARTH
January 21-29, 2026
In the wake of a winter storm that blanketed numerous U.S. states with snow and ice, unusually low temperatures
continued to grip a large swath of the nation east of the Rockies in late
January 2026. The cold spell was notable for severity, longevity, and
geographic scope.
This animation depicts surface air
temperatures across part of the Northern Hemisphere, including North America,
from January 21 to 29. It combines satellite observations with temperatures
calculated by a version of the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) global model, which uses mathematical
equations to simulate physical processes in the atmosphere.
Dark blue areas indicate the lowest
surface air temperatures. The brief pulses show daily warming and cooling,
while the broader pattern reveals cold air spreading south and east and
lingering through much of the week.
According to the National Weather
Service (NWS), the surge of Arctic air pushed
deep into the United States on January 22, ushering in a period of low temperatures and harsh
wind chills. The cold coincided with a jet of moisture to produce significant
accumulations of snow and ice spanning from the U.S. Southwest to New England.
In the days after the storm, dangerously cold weather persisted. In the Midwest, for example, the temperature in Alliance, Nebraska, dropped to minus 26 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 32 degrees Celsius) on January 24, the lowest daily minimum temperature for that date on record, according to preliminary NWS reports. In the South, an extreme cold warning was in effect in south-central Texas overnight on January 26, with temperatures dipping into the single digits. By January 27, parts of the South had started to see slight warming, but wind chills down to -20°F (-29°C) continued across the Midwest and Northeast.
According to meteorologists, the cold snap was caused by frigid air from the Canadian and Siberian
Arctic funneling into eastern North America, then being driven south as
high-pressure systems forced the jet stream to dip. Forecasts called for another blast of Arctic air late in
the week, with below-normal temperatures persisting into early February.
The lingering cold has posed extra
challenges to those who remained without power or heat after the storm and for those working to clean up, clear streets, and restore power and transportation services.
NASA’s Disasters Response Coordination System has been activated to support agencies
responding to the winter storm. The team will be posting maps and data products
on its open-access mapping portal as new information becomes available.
NASA Earth Observatory images and
animation by Lauren Dauphin, using GEOS data from the Global Modeling and
Assimilation Office at NASA GSFC. Story by Kathryn Hansen.
References
& Resources
- The Conversation (2026,
January 24) How the polar vortex and warm ocean intensified a major US
winter storm. Accessed January 29, 2026.
- NASA Earth Observatory
(2026, January 28) Snow Buries the U.S. Interior and East. Accessed January 29, 2026.
- NBC News (2026, January
27) Millions remain under warnings as extreme cold has icy grip on much
of the U.S. Accessed January 29, 2026.
- NWS Weather Prediction
Center, via X (2026, January 27) Dangerously cold temperatures continue. Accessed January 29, 2026.
- The Washington Post (2026, January 28) Extreme cold spell shaping up as one of D.C.’s longest in 150 years. Accessed January 29, 2026.
- Yale Climate Connections (2026, January 23) Winter 2025-26 (finally) hits the U.S. with a vengeance. Accessed January 29, 2026.
Friday, January 30, 2026
Higher water levels could turn cultivated peatland in the North into a CO₂ sink - Earth - Earth Sciences - Environment
Northern lights over the experimental
trial site in Pasvik. Credit: Mikhail Mastepanov
In its natural state, peatland is
one of the largest carbon stores in nature. This is because the soil is so
waterlogged and low in oxygen that dead plant material breaks down very slowly.
The plants do not fully decompose but instead accumulate over thousands of
years, forming thick layers of peat. When a peatland is drained for
agricultural use, the water level drops and oxygen enters the peat layer.
Microorganisms can then break down the old plant material much faster,
releasing carbon that has been stored for many years as the greenhouse gas
carbon dioxide (CO₂).
Well-studied in the South, but not in the North
Since the 1600s, large peatland
areas in Europe and the Nordic region have been drained, and many studies have
investigated how drainage and changing water levels influence greenhouse gas
emissions. However, there is little knowledge about the northernmost drained
peatlands, where the climate is characterized by low temperatures, long, light
summer nights, and short growing seasons.
"From studies in warmer
regions, we know that raising the groundwater level in drained and cultivated
peatland often reduces CO₂ emissions, because the peat decomposes more
slowly," explains NIBIO researcher Junbin Zhao. "At the same time,
wetter and low-oxygen conditions can increase methane, since the microbes that
produce methane thrive when there is almost no oxygen in the soil."
Under certain conditions, nitrous
oxide emissions may also rise. This happens when the soil is moist but not
fully waterlogged, so that nitrogen breakdown stops halfway and produces
nitrous oxide instead of harmless nitrogen gas.
"Because each greenhouse gas
reacts differently to changes in water level, one gas can go down while another
goes up. That's why it's important to look at the overall gas balance,"
says Zhao. "We need to measure CO₂, methane, and nitrous oxide at the same time and
throughout the whole season to understand the real net effect in the
northernmost agricultural areas."
Two-year field trial in the Pasvik Valley, Finnmark
In 2022 and 2023, Zhao and
colleagues conducted an extensive field trial at NIBIO's station at Svanhovd in
the Pasvik Valley in Northern Norway. Automatic chambers measured CO₂, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions several times a
day throughout the growing season.
"The experiment included five
plots that together reflected typical management conditions found in a drained
agricultural field—with different groundwater levels, different amounts of
fertilizer, and different numbers of harvests per season," Zhao explains.
The results are published in the journal Global Change Biology.
The researchers wanted to answer
three questions:
1.
Can raising the groundwater level make a cultivated Arctic peatland close to
climate-neutral?
2.
Does the water level affect soil CO₂ emissions more than it affects plant CO₂ uptake?
3.
How do fertilization and harvesting influence the total climate balance?
High water levels reduced emissions
The results showed that when the
peatland in Pasvik was well drained, it emitted large amounts of CO₂—about the same as other cultivated peatlands further
south. However, when the groundwater was raised to 25–50 cm below the surface,
emissions dropped sharply.
"At these higher water levels,
methane and nitrous oxide emissions were also low, giving a much better overall
gas balance. Under such conditions, the field even absorbed slightly more CO₂ than it released," says Zhao.
High groundwater in cultivated
Arctic peatland may therefore be an effective climate measure.
"Our findings are especially
interesting because emissions were measured continuously around the clock. This
meant we captured short spikes of unusually high emissions and natural daily
fluctuations, details often missed when measurements are taken only
occasionally."
Works best in cold climates
When the groundwater is high, the
soil becomes wetter and oxygen levels in the root zone fall. Under these
conditions, plants are less active and take up less CO₂.
Even so, the total CO₂ emissions decrease in the field.
"This is because wet conditions mean that the field needs less light before it
starts to absorb more CO₂ than it releases. When this threshold is reached
earlier in the day, you get more hours with net carbon uptake," Zhao
explains. "Our calculations show that this effect is especially strong in
the north, due to the long, light summer nights. These provide many extra hours
where the system remains on the positive side, which can increase total CO₂ uptake significantly."
Temperature, however, proved to be
a key factor. The researchers found that when soil temperatures rose above about 12°C, microbial activity
increased.
"At higher temperatures,
microorganisms break down organic material faster, and both CO₂ and methane emissions rise," says Zhao.
"This means that the effect of high water levels is greatest in cool
climates—and that future warming could reduce the benefit. In practice, this
means water levels must be considered together with temperature and local
conditions."
Fertilization and harvesting: Balancing production and carbon
Fertilization and harvesting also
affected the climate balance. When the researchers applied more fertilizer, the
grass grew better. "More fertilizer produced more biomass but did not lead
to noticeable changes in CO₂ or methane emissions in our experiment," says
Zhao.
Harvesting, however, had a clear
effect. When the grass was cut and removed, carbon was removed from the system
because plants store carbon as they grow. "If harvesting is very frequent,
more carbon can be taken out than is built up again over time. The peat layer
may gradually lose carbon even when water levels are kept high," Zhao
explains.
He says it is therefore important
to consider water level, fertilization, and harvesting strategy together.
Measures that reduce emissions in the short term may reduce carbon storage in
the long term, which can weaken soil health.
"One solution could be paludiculture, i.e., growing plant species that tolerate wet
conditions so that biomass can be produced without keeping the soil dry."
Local variations can alter the climate balance
The researchers found large
differences in emissions within the same field. Some areas absorbed CO₂, while others released large amounts.
"Such local variation can greatly influence national climate accounting and how measures are designed, because one standard emission factor may not reflect reality everywhere," Zhao says. "The results from our study show a clear need for more detailed measurements and more precise water-level management in practice, especially where soils and farming conditions vary significantly between locations."
Provided by Norwegian Institute of
Bioeconomy Research
by Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy
Research
edited by Lisa Lock, reviewed by Robert Egan
Source: Higher water levels could turn cultivated peatland in the North into a CO₂ sink













.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)
.gif)

