You may not realize it, but each time you recall a memory—like your first time riding a bike or walking into your high school prom—your brain changes the memory ever so slightly. It’s almost like adding an Instagram filter, with details being filled in and information being updated or lost with each recall.
“We’re inadvertently applying filters to our past
experiences,” says Steve Ramirez (CAS’10),
a Boston University neuroscientist. Even though a filtered memory is different
from the original, you can tell what that basic picture is for the most part,
he says.
“Memory is less of a video recording of
the past, and more reconstructive,” says Ramirez, a BU College of Arts &
Sciences assistant professor of psychological and brain sciences. The malleable
nature of memory is both a blessing and curse: it’s bad if we remember false
details, but it’s good that our brains have the natural ability to mold and
update memories to make them less potent, especially if it is something scary
or traumatic.
So, what if it’s possible to use the
malleable nature of our memories to our advantage, as a way to cure mental
health disorders like depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)?
That is exactly what Ramirez and his research team are working to do. And after
years of studying memory in mice, they’ve found not only where the brain stores
positive and negative memories, but also how to turn the volume down on
negative memories by artificially stimulating other, happier ones.
“Our million-dollar idea is, what if a solution for some of these mental disorders already exists in the brain? And what if memory is one way of getting there?” Ramirez asks. In two new papers, he and his team demonstrate the power of our emotional memories and how our experiences—and the way we process them—leave actual physical footprints on the brain.
Mapping Positive and Negative Memories
One of the most important steps toward using memory to
treat memory-related disorders is understanding where positive and negative
memories exist in the brain, and how to distinguish between the two. Memories
are stored in all different areas across the brain, and the individual memories
themselves exist as networks of cells called engrams. Ramirez’s lab is
particularly interested in the networks of memories located in the brain’s
hippocampus, a cashew-shaped structure that stores sensory and emotional
information important for forming and retrieving memories.
In a new paper published
in Nature Communications Biology, Ramirez, lead author Monika Shpokayte (MED’26),
and a team of BU neuroscientists map out the key molecular and genetic
differences between positive and negative memories, finding that the two are
actually strikingly distinct on multiple levels. It turns out that emotional
memories, like a positive or negative memory, are physically distinct from
other types of brain cells—and distinct from each other.
“That’s pretty wild, because it suggests that these
positive and negative memories have their own separate real estate in the
brain,” says Ramirez, who’s also a member of BU’s Center for Systems Neuroscience.
The study authors found that positive
and negative memory cells are different from each other in almost every
way—they are mostly stored in different regions of the hippocampus, they
communicate to other cells using different types of pathways, and the molecular
machinery in both types of cells seems to be distinct.
“So, there’s [potentially] a molecular
basis for differentiating between positive and negative memories in the brain,”
Ramirez says. “We now have a bunch of markers that we know differentiate
positive from negative in the hippocampus.”
Seeing and labeling positive and
negative memories is only possible with the use of an advanced neuroscience
tool, called optogenetics. This is a way to trick brain cell receptors to
respond to light—researchers shine a harmless laser light into the brain to
turn on cells that have been given a receptor that responds to light. They can
also color-code positive and negative memories by inserting a fluorescent
protein that is stimulated by light, so that positive memory cell networks glow
green, for example, and negative cell networks glow red or blue.
Rewiring Bad Memories
Before the researchers label a memory in a mouse, they first have to make the
memory. To do this, they expose the rodents to a universally good or unpleasant
experience—a positive experience could be nibbling on some tasty cheese or
socializing with other mice; a negative experience could be receiving a mild
but surprising electrical shock to the feet. Once a new memory is formed, the
scientists can find the network of cells that hold on to that experience, and
have them glow a certain color.
Once they can see the memory, researchers can use
laser light to artificially activate those memory cells—and, as Ramirez’s team
has also discovered, rewrite the negative memories. In a paper published in Nature Communications, they
found that artificial activation of a positive experience permanently rewrote a
negative experience, dialing the emotional intensity of the bad memory down.
The researchers had the mice recall a negative
experience, and during the fear memory recall, they artificially reactivated a
group of positive memory cells. The competing positive memory, according to the
paper, updated the fear memory, reducing the fear response at the time and long
after the memory was activated. The study builds on previous work from Ramirez’s lab that found it’s possible to
artificially manipulate past memories.
Activating a positive memory was the
most powerful way to update a negative memory, but the team also found it’s not
the only way. Instead of targeting just positive memory cells, they also tried
activating a neutral memory—some standard, boring experience for an animal—and
then tried activating the whole hippocampus, finding that both were
effective.
“If you stimulate a lot of cells not necessarily tied
to any type of memory, that can cause enough interference to disrupt the fear
memory,” says Stephanie Grella,
lead author and a former postdoctoral fellow in the Ramirez Lab who recently
started the Memory & Neuromodulatory Mechanisms Lab at Loyola University.
Even though artificially activating
memories is not possible to do in humans, the findings could still translate to
clinical settings, Grella says. “Because you can ask the person, ‘Can you
remember something negative, can you remember something positive?’” she
says—questions you can’t ask a mouse.
She suggests that it could be possible
to override the impacts of a negative memory, one that has affected a person’s
mental state, by having a person recall the bad memory, and correctly timing a
vivid recall of a positive one in a therapeutic setting.
“We know that memories are malleable,” Grella says. “One of the things that we found in this paper was that the timing of the stimulation was really critical.”
The Quest for Game Changers
For other, more intensive types of treatment for
severe depression and PTSD, Grella suggests that it could eventually be
possible to stimulate large swaths of the hippocampus with tools like
transcranial magnetic stimulation or deep brain stimulation—an invasive
procedure—to help people overcome these memory-related disorders. Ramirez
points out that more and more neuroscientists have started to embrace
experimental treatments involving psychedelics and illicit drugs. For example,
a 2021 study found
that controlled doses of MDMA helped relieve some severe PTSD symptoms.
“The theme here is using some aspects of
reward and positivity to rewrite the negative components of our past,” Ramirez
says. “It’s analogous to what we’re doing in rodents, except in humans—we
artificially activated positive memories in rodents, and in humans, what they
did was give them small doses of MDMA to see if that could be enough to rewrite
some of the traumatic components of that experience.” These types of
experiments point to the importance of continuing to explore the clinical and
beneficial methods of memory manipulation, but it’s important to note that
these experiments were done under close medical supervision and shouldn’t be
attempted at home.
For now, Ramirez is excited to see how this work can further push the boundaries in neuroscience, and hopes to see researchers experiment with even more out-of-the-box ideas that can transform medicine in the future: “We want game changers, right?” he says. “We want things that are going to be way more effective than the currently available treatment options.”
Source: https://www.bu.edu/articles/2022/unlocking-the-power-of-our-emotional-memory/
Source: Unlocking
the Power of Our Emotional Memory – Scents of Science (myfusimotors.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment