This bar graph shows GISTEMP summer global temperature
anomalies for 2023 (shown in yellow) and 2024 (shown in red). June through
August is considered meteorological summer in the Northern Hemisphere. The
white lines indicate the range of estimated temperatures. The warmer-than-usual
summers continue a long-term trend of warming, driven primarily by human-caused
greenhouse gas emissions.
NASA/Peter Jacobs
The agency also shared new state-of-the-art datasets that allow scientists
to track Earth’s temperature for any month and region going back to 1880 with
greater certainty.
August 2024 set a new monthly
temperature record, capping Earth’s hottest summer since global records began
in 1880, according to scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies
(GISS) in New York. The announcement comes as a new analysis upholds confidence
in the agency’s nearly 145-year-old temperature record.
June, July, and August 2024
combined were about 0.2 degrees Fahrenheit (about 0.1 degrees Celsius) warmer
globally than any other summer in NASA’s record — narrowly topping the record
just set in 2023. Summer of 2024 was 2.25 F (1.25 C) warmer than the average
summer between 1951 and 1980, and August alone was 2.34 F (1.3 C) warmer than
average. June through August is considered meteorological summer in the
Northern Hemisphere.
“Data from multiple record-keepers
show that the warming of the past two years may be neck and neck, but it is
well above anything seen in years prior, including strong El Niño years,” said
Gavin Schmidt, director of GISS. “This is a clear indication of the ongoing
human-driven warming of the climate.”
NASA assembles its temperature
record, known as the GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP), from surface
air temperature data acquired by tens of thousands of meteorological stations,
as well as sea surface temperatures from ship- and buoy-based instruments. It
also includes measurements from Antarctica. Analytical methods consider the
varied spacing of temperature stations around the globe and urban heating
effects that could skew the calculations.
The GISTEMP analysis calculates
temperature anomalies rather than absolute temperature. A temperature anomaly
shows how far the temperature has departed from the 1951 to 1980 base average.
New assessment
of temperature record
The summer record comes as new research from scientists at the Colorado School of Mines,
National Science Foundation, the National Atmospheric and Oceanic
Administration (NOAA), and NASA further increases confidence in the agency’s
global and regional temperature data.
“Our goal was to actually quantify how good of a temperature estimate we’re making for any given time or place,” said lead author Nathan Lenssen, a professor at the Colorado School of Mines and project scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR).
This visualization of GISTEMP monthly temperatures
with the seasonal cycle derived from the Global Modeling and Assimilation
Office’s MERRA-2 model compares 2023 (in red) and 2024 (in purple), with a
transparent ribbon around each indicating the confidence intervals from the new
GISTEMP uncertainty calculation. The white lines show monthly temperatures from
the years 1961 to 2022. June, July, and August 2024 combined were about 0.2
degrees Fahrenheit (about 0.1 degrees Celsius) warmer globally than any other
summer in NASA’s record — narrowly topping the record set in 2023.
NASA/Peter Jacobs/Katy Mersmann
The researchers affirmed that GISTEMP is correctly capturing rising surface
temperatures on our planet and that Earth’s global temperature increase since
the late 19th century — summer 2024 was about 2.7 F (1.51 C) warmer than the
late 1800s — cannot be explained by any uncertainty or error in the data.
The authors built on previous work showing that NASA’s estimate of global mean temperature rise is
likely accurate to within a tenth of a degree Fahrenheit in recent decades. For
their latest analysis, Lenssen and colleagues examined the data for individual
regions and for every month going back to 1880.
Estimating the unknown
Lenssen and colleagues provided a
rigorous accounting of statistical uncertainty within the GISTEMP record.
Uncertainty in science is important to understand because we cannot take
measurements everywhere. Knowing the strengths and limitations of observations
helps scientists assess if they’re really seeing a shift or change in the
world.
The study confirmed that one of the
most significant sources of uncertainty in the GISTEMP record is localized
changes around meteorological stations. For example, a previously rural station
may report higher temperatures as asphalt and other heat-trapping urban
surfaces develop around it. Spatial gaps between stations also contribute some
uncertainty in the record. GISTEMP accounts for these gaps using estimates from
the closest stations.
Previously, scientists using
GISTEMP estimated historical temperatures using what’s known in statistics as a
confidence interval — a range of values around a measurement, often read as a
specific temperature plus or minus a few fractions of degrees. The new approach
uses a method known as a statistical ensemble: a spread of the 200 most
probable values. While a confidence interval represents a level of certainty
around a single data point, an ensemble tries to capture the whole range of
possibilities.
The distinction between the two
methods is meaningful to scientists tracking how temperatures have changed,
especially where there are spatial gaps. For example: Say GISTEMP contains
thermometer readings from Denver in July 1900, and a researcher needs to
estimate what conditions were 100 miles away. Instead of reporting the Denver
temperature plus or minus a few degrees, the researcher can analyze scores of
equally probable values for southern Colorado and communicate the uncertainty
in their results.
What does this mean for recent heat rankings?
Every year, NASA scientists use
GISTEMP to provide an annual global temperature update, with 2023 ranking as
the hottest year to date.
Other researchers affirmed this
finding, including NOAA and the European Union’s Copernicus Climate Change Service. These institutions employ different, independent
methods to assess Earth’s temperature. Copernicus, for instance, uses an
advanced computer-generated approach known as reanalysis.
The records remain in broad agreement but can differ in some specific findings. Copernicus determined that July 2023 was Earth’s hottest month on record, for example, while NASA found July 2024 had a narrow edge. The new ensemble analysis has now shown that the difference between the two months is smaller than the uncertainties in the data. In other words, they are effectively tied for hottest. Within the larger historical record the new ensemble estimates for summer 2024 were likely 2.52-2.86 degrees F (1.40-1.59 degrees C) warmer than the late 19th century, while 2023 was likely 2.34-2.68 degrees F (1.30-1.49 degrees C) warmer.
No comments:
Post a Comment