What information is retained in a memory over time, and which parts get lost? These questions have led to many scientific theories over the years, and now a team of researchers at the Universities of Glasgow and Birmingham have been able to provide some answers.
Their new study, which is
published in Nature Communications, demonstrates that our memories
become less vibrant and detailed over time, with only the central gist
eventually preserved. Moreover, this ‘gistification’ of our memories is boosted
when we frequently recall our recent experiences.
The work could have
implications in a number of areas, including the nature of memories in
post-traumatic stress disorder, the repeated questioning of eye-witness
testimonies and even in best practice for exam studying.
While memories are not exact
carbon copies of the past — remembering is understood to be a highly
reconstructive process — experts have suggested that the contents of a memory
could change each time we bring it back to mind.
However, exactly how our
memories differ from the original experiences, and how they are transformed
over time, has until now proven difficult to measure in laboratory settings.
For this study the
researchers developed a simple computerised task that measures how fast people
can recover certain characteristics of visual memories when prompted to do so.
Participants learned word-image pairs and were later required to recollect
different elements of the image when cued with the word. For example,
participants were asked to indicate, as fast as possible, if the image was
coloured or greyscale (a perceptual detail), or whether it showed an animate or
inanimate object (a semantic element).
These tests, probing the
quality of the visual memories, happened immediately after learning and also
after a two-day delay. Reaction time patterns showed that participants were
faster to recollect meaningful, semantic elements than surface, perceptual
ones.
Julia Lifanov, lead author of
the study from the University of Birmingham, said: “Many memory theories assume
that over time, and as people re-tell their stories, they tend to forget the
surface details but retain the meaningful, semantic content of an event.
“Imagine reminiscing about a
pre-COVID dinner with a friend — you realize that you cannot recall the table
décor but know exactly what you ordered; or you remember the conversation with
the bartender, but not the colour of his shirt. Memory experts call this
phenomenon ‘semanticization’.”
Prof Maria Wimber, senior
author on the study from the University of Glasgow, said: “The pattern towards
recollection of meaningful semantic elements we demonstrate in this study
indicates that memories are biased towards meaningful content in the first
place — and we have shown in previous studies that this bias is clearly
reflected in brain signals too.
“Our memories change with
time and use and that is a good and adaptive thing. We want our memories to
retain the information that is most likely to be useful in the future, when we
encounter similar situations.”
The researchers found that
the bias towards semantic memory content becomes significantly stronger with
the passage of time, and with repeated remembering. When participants came back
to the lab two days later, they were much slower at answering the perceptual-detailed
questions, but they show relatively preserved memory for the semantic content
of the images. However, the shift from detail-rich to more concept-based
memories was far less pronounced in a group of subjects who repeatedly viewed
the images, rather than being asked to actively bringing them back to mind.
The study has implications
for probing the nature of memories in health and disease. It provides a tool to
study maladaptive changes, for example in post-traumatic stress disorder where
patients often suffer from intrusive, traumatic memories, and tend to
over-generalize these experiences to novel situations. The findings are also
highly relevant for understanding how eyewitness memories may be biased by
frequent interviews and repeatedly recalling the same event.
The findings also demonstrate
that testing yourself prior to an exam (for example, by using flashcards) will
make the meaningful information stick for longer, especially when followed by
periods of rest and sleep.
Journal article: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-23288-5
No comments:
Post a Comment