Previous “world-avoided” experiments have shown that, without the Montreal Protocol, ozone levels would be depleted globally by the mid-twentieth century. Credits: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio
Protecting the ozone layer also protects Earth’s vegetation and has
prevented the planet from an additional 0.85 degrees Celsius of warming, according
to new research from Lancaster University, NASA, and others. This new study in Nature
demonstrates that by protecting the ozone layer, which blocks harmful
ultraviolet (UV) radiation, the Montreal Protocol regulating ozone-depleting
substances also protects plants – and their ability to pull carbon from the
atmosphere. The impact from plants has not been accounted for in previous
climate change research.
“We know the ozone layer is connected to climate. We know greenhouse gases
affect the ozone layer. But what we’ve never done before this is connect the
ozone layer to the terrestrial carbon cycle,” said lead author Paul Young, an
atmospheric and climate scientist at Lancaster University in the United
Kingdom.
The ozone layer in the upper atmosphere, or stratosphere, blocks UV
radiation that can damage living tissue, including plants. The ozone “hole,” discovered in 1985,
is the result of humans emitting chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), which are
ozone-depleting chemicals and greenhouse gases that were once commonly used as
coolants in refrigerators and in aerosols like hairspray. They were then phased
out of use by the Montreal Protocol signed in 1987 and its subsequent
amendments.
Scientists have previously
simulated the world that we avoided by banning CFCs. Now,
the new study returns to the same question – what would happen if CFCs
continued to be emitted? – and looked at the effect on plants.
“Past world-avoided experiments have never considered the impacts of
increased UV radiation on plants, and what that would mean for the plants’
ability to sequester carbon,” said Young.
Nearly 200 countries came together to sign the Montreal Protocol in 1987, which limited CFC emissions. The production of CFCs was eventually phased out, and the ozone layer is recovering as a result. Credits: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center/Katy Mersmann Please download more visuals at NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio
The team used a series of models to gain a more complete picture and
simulate two hypothetical scenarios: the world projected and the world avoided.
“The world projected is similar to the path we’re currently on,” said Luke
Oman, a research physical scientist focusing on atmospheric chemistry and
dynamics at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. “The
world avoided represents a path not taken.”
For the world-avoided scenario, the researchers assumed that CFC emissions
would increase at the same rate, 3% every year, from the 1970s onward. The
models show that there would be a huge thinning of the ozone layer across the
globe by 2050. By 2100, ozone holes forming in the tropics would be worse than
what has been observed in the Antarctic ozone hole.
In their models of the world-avoided, a depleted ozone layer would let more
harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation reach the surface, inhibiting plants from
storing carbon in their tissue and in the soil. As a result, atmospheric CO2
levels are estimated to be 30% higher than they would likely be under Earth’s
current trajectory. Consequently, Earth would likely be an additional 0.85°C
hotter in that “world-avoided” scenario solely because of the impact on
plants.
This global thinning of the ozone layer would allow significantly more
harmful UV radiation from the sun to reach the surface, which would effectively
sunburn the plants on Earth, said Young. Earth’s trees and vegetation would be
much less efficient at photosynthesis, hindering their ability to absorb carbon
out of the atmosphere and sequester it, storing carbon in plant tissue and the
soil for many years. Overall, the damage to plants would result in 580 billion
metric tons less carbon stored in forests, soil and vegetation. It would
instead be released into the atmosphere, increasing atmospheric CO2 levels by
30% on average compared to the world projected scenario.
That huge increase in atmospheric CO2 alone would cause global temperatures
to rise 0.85°C by 2100, according to the models. That’s on top of the warming
Earth may experience due to prior and expected emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse
gases, as well as the 1.7°C of direct warming due to increased CFC emissions in
this scenario.
But how do we know this “world-avoided” scenario is anything like the world
that would come to be without the Montreal Protocol? The team checked their models
against historical data collected by NASA satellites and other available data
from NASA’s partners. For example, they looked at ozone levels recorded by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) aboard NASA’s
Aura satellite and compared them to what the models
‘predicted’ would have happened. What happened in the model was very close to
what actually happened in the past, giving the scientists confidence that their
model could accurately project what may happen in the future.
By Sofie Bates
NASA's Earth Science News Team
No comments:
Post a Comment