Reconstruction
of Swaindelphys. Credit: Kristen Tietjen
They
say everything's bigger in Texas. And that appears to be true, at least in the
case of a group of ancient near-marsupials scientists call Swaindelphys.
Paleontologists from the University of
Kansas have described for the first time a species of Swaindelphys
discovered in Texas' Big Bend National Park, though the ecosystem was
drastically different in the Paleocene, when it thrived, than today.
Dubbed Swaindelphys solastella, the new species is much larger than similar species of
Swaindelphys known from that period.
Their report detailing the ancient
species, which was gigantic by the standards of Swaindelphys but still about
the size of a modern hedgehog, appears in the Journal
of Vertebrate Paleontology.
Lead author Kristen Miller, doctoral
student at KU's Biodiversity Institute and Natural History Museum, spent a year
examining specimens collected decades ago in West Texas by the late Judith
Schiebout, a paleontologist whose career was spent at Louisiana State
University.
Some of the fossils collected at Big
Bend by teams led by Schiebout had never been thoroughly studied, including
molars that piqued Miller's interest. She wanted to find out what kind of
metatherians—the group that includes living marsupials and their extinct
relatives—the Texas fossils represented.
"I compared them to a lot of other
marsupials from around the same time period to see what they're most closely
related to," Miller said. "It was a lot of morphological
comparisons."
The researchers initially thought the
fossils were either survivors of a group of large Cretaceous metatherians that
somehow made it through the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event or that they
were the oldest member of a group of Eocene metatherians that showed up a few
million years later.
Miller's analysis eventually showed that
both ideas were wrong. The Texas specimens belong to a surprisingly large
species of Swaindelphys.
"Not only are they the largest
metatherians from this time period, but they're also the youngest and located
at the most southern latitude," Miller said.
Miller's doctoral advisor and co-author,
Chris Beard, senior curator with KU's Biodiversity Institute and Foundation
Distinguished Professor, said the first fossil mammals of the Paleocene age in
Big Bend were first described decades ago.
"But our work is aimed at
uncovering some of the smaller and harder-to-find fossil mammals that lived in
Big Bend at that time," Beard said. "The new fossil we're describing
is notable because it's the largest marsupial—in terms of body size—found so
far in the North American Paleocene.
"Since everything is bigger in
Texas, this is perhaps not surprising."
The KU researchers said their study of
Swaindelphys potentially informs scientific study of early primates that
inhabited the same ecosystems in Texas. Indeed, because Swaindelphys was in so
many ways like early primates, their behavior and ancient distribution is seen
by paleontologists as a collateral way to understand primate history.
For
this reason, the research into Swaindelphys solastella—including analysis of
specimens from the LSU and University of Texas at Austin collections—and new
fieldwork in Big Bend National Park was supported by The Leakey Foundation, a
donor-supported nonprofit organization with a mission "to uncover the
story of human evolution and share this knowledge with the world."
Along these lines, the KU researchers
said the distribution patterns of Swaindelphys could indicate what kinds of
natural features and barriers constrained the geographical spread of species in
this time period, including early primates.
"It's during the Paleocene, so it
would have been warmer than it is now—probably more on the tropical side,"
Miller said. "In place of desert terrain seen today, there was a lot more
vegetation and probably lots of rivers and streams. We find these fossils in
what we call fluvial deposits— so, deposits from ancient river systems."
The investigators are interested in the
differences in the kinds of fossil species found in more northern zones—like
Wyoming and Alberta, Canada—compared to southern areas like the U.S.-Mexico
border in the vicinity of Big Bend National Park.
"What's interesting about the
localities in Texas is we have some taxa we'd call 'anachronistic'—things we
don't expect to see in Texas during the time these fossils were
deposited," Miller said. "The fossil record in places like the Bighorn Basin in
Wyoming is very complete. It's a really nice stratigraphic sequence spanning
millions of years, so it's easy in the Bighorn Basin to compare fossils from
different localities.
"We call it biostratigraphy—you
basically use the fossils to understand what time period you're in. If you have
certain taxa, you know it has to be from a specific time period."
But outside of the Bighorn Basin, the
picture gets murkier, according to the KU paleontologists. They said it's
harder to pinpoint the time periods associated with fossils. Miller and Beard
wondered if some kind of geographic barrier was behind the difference.
Working with colleagues from KU's
Department of Geology, they've identified "an ancient high point or divide
in the landscape, in southern Wyoming, that seems to correspond with the shift
we see," Miller said.
"North of that ancient divide, we
see the classic Bighorn Basin taxa in their expected time periods," she
said. "But south of that, in river drainages that originate in the central
Rockies and areas farther to the south, things start to go a little wacky. What
we're proposing is that this shift in river drainages marked the boundaries
where ancient species of marsupials and primates lived."
Miller and Beard think ancient
landscapes posed obstacles to species distribution during the Paleocene—some
taxa couldn't cross rivers and high points, while others could. Miller plans to
investigate the question with follow-up research.
"That's our working hypothesis, and it's something I'll be looking into later in my dissertation," she said. "We want to see if we can nail down, quantitatively, whether there's a significant difference on either side of that potential barrier."
Source: Big possum that lived 60 million years ago unearthed in Texas
No comments:
Post a Comment