NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope just solved a conundrum by proving a controversial finding made with the agency’s Hubble Space Telescope more than 20 years ago.
In 2003, Hubble provided evidence of a massive planet around a very old star,
almost as old as the universe. Such stars possess only small amounts of heavier
elements that are the building blocks of planets. This implied that some planet
formation happened when our universe was very young, and those planets had time
to form and grow big inside their primordial disks, even bigger than Jupiter.
But how? This was puzzling.
To answer this question,
researchers used Webb to study stars in a nearby galaxy that, much like the
early universe, lacks large amounts of heavy elements. They found that not only
do some stars there have planet-forming disks, but that those disks are longer-lived
than those seen around young stars in our Milky Way galaxy.
“With Webb, we have a really strong
confirmation of what we saw with Hubble, and we must rethink how we model
planet formation and early evolution in the young universe,” said study leader
Guido De Marchi of the European Space Research and Technology Centre in
Noordwijk, Netherlands.
Image A: Protoplanetary Disks in NGC 346 (NIRCam Image)
This is a James Webb Space Telescope image of NGC 346,
a massive star cluster in the Small Magellanic Cloud, a dwarf galaxy that is
one of the Milky Way's nearest neighbors. With its relative lack of elements
heavier than hydrogen and helium, the NGC 346 cluster serves as a nearby proxy
for studying stellar environments with similar conditions in the early, distant
universe. Ten, small, yellow circles overlaid on the image indicate the
positions of the ten stars surveyed in this study.
NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, Olivia C.
Jones (UK ATC), Guido De Marchi (ESTEC), Margaret Meixner (USRA)
A Different Environment in Early Times
In the early universe, stars formed
from mostly hydrogen and helium, and very few heavier elements such as carbon
and iron, which came later through supernova explosions.
“Current models predict that with
so few heavier elements, the disks around stars have a short lifetime, so short
in fact that planets cannot grow big,” said the Webb study’s co-investigator
Elena Sabbi, chief scientist for Gemini Observatory at the National Science
Foundation’s NOIRLab in Tucson. "But Hubble did see those planets, so what
if the models were not correct and disks could live longer?"
To test this idea, scientists
trained Webb on the Small Magellanic Cloud, a dwarf galaxy that is one of the
Milky Way’s nearest neighbors. In particular, they examined the massive,
star-forming cluster NGC 346, which also has a relative lack of heavier elements.
The cluster served as a nearby proxy for studying stellar environments with
similar conditions in the early, distant universe.
Hubble observations of NGC 346 from
the mid 2000s revealed many stars about 20 to 30 million years old that seemed
to still have planet-forming disks around them. This went against the
conventional belief that such disks would dissipate after 2 or 3 million years.
“The Hubble findings were
controversial, going against not only empirical evidence in our galaxy but also
against the current models,” said De Marchi. “This was intriguing, but without
a way to obtain spectra of those stars, we could not really establish
whether we were witnessing genuine accretion and the presence of disks, or just
some artificial effects.”
Now, thanks to Webb’s sensitivity
and resolution, scientists have the first-ever spectra of forming, Sun-like
stars and their immediate environments in a nearby galaxy.
“We see that these stars are indeed
surrounded by disks and are still in the process of gobbling material, even at
the relatively old age of 20 or 30 million years,” said De Marchi. “This also
implies that planets have more time to form and grow around these stars than in
nearby star-forming regions in our own galaxy.”
Image B: Protoplanetary Disks in NGC 346 Spectra (NIRSpec)
This graph shows, on the bottom left in yellow, a
spectrum of one of the 10 target stars in this study (as well as accompanying
light from the immediate background environment). Spectral fingerprints of hot
atomic helium, cold molecular hydrogen, and hot atomic hydrogen are
highlighted. On the top left in magenta is a spectrum slightly offset from the
star that includes only light from the background environment. This second
spectrum lacks a spectral line of cold molecular hydrogen.
On the right is the comparison of the top and bottom lines. This comparison
shows a large peak in the cold molecular hydrogen coming from the star but not
its nebular environment. Also, atomic hydrogen shows a larger peak from the
star. This indicates the presence of a protoplanetary disk immediately
surrounding the star. The data was taken with the microshutter array on the
James Webb Space Telescope's NIRSpec (Near-Infrared Spectrometer) instrument.
Illustration: NASA, ESA, CSA,
Joseph Olmsted (STScI)
A New Way of Thinking
This finding refutes previous
theoretical predictions that when there are very few heavier elements in the
gas around the disk, the star would very quickly blow away the disk. So the
disk’s life would be very short, even less than a million years. But if a disk
doesn't stay around the star long enough for the dust grains to stick together
and pebbles to form and become the core of a planet, how can planets form?
The researchers explained that
there could be two distinct mechanisms, or even a combination, for
planet-forming disks to persist in environments scarce in heavier elements.
First, to be able to blow away the
disk, the star applies radiation pressure. For this pressure to be effective,
elements heavier than hydrogen and helium would have to reside in the gas. But
the massive star cluster NGC 346 only has about ten percent of the heavier
elements that are present in the chemical composition of our Sun. Perhaps it
simply takes longer for a star in this cluster to disperse its disk.
The second possibility is that, for
a Sun-like star to form when there are few heavier elements, it would have to
start from a larger cloud of gas. A bigger gas cloud will produce a bigger
disk. So there is more mass in the disk and therefore it would take longer to
blow the disk away, even if the radiation pressure were working in the same
way.
“With more matter around the stars,
the accretion lasts for a longer time,” said Sabbi. "The disks take ten
times longer to disappear. This has implications for how you form a planet, and
the type of system architecture that you can have in these different
environments. This is so exciting.”
The science team’s paper appears in
the Dec. 16 issue of The Astrophysical Journal.
Image C: NGC 346: Hubble and Webb Observations
Before and After
NGC 346: Hubble and Webb
Observations
Image Details
This side-by-side comparison shows a Hubble image of the massive star cluster NGC 346 (left) versus a Webb image of the same cluster (right). While the Hubble image shows more nebulosity, the Webb image pierces through those clouds to reveal more of the cluster's structure. NGC 346 has a relative lack of elements heavier than helium and hydrogen, making it a good proxy for stellar environments in the early, distant universe.
Source: NASA’s Webb Finds Planet-Forming Disks Lived Longer in Early Universe - NASA Science
No comments:
Post a Comment